.jpeg)
🧠 A Nation at an Educational Crossroads
In 2025, Nigeria’s tertiary education system stands at a critical crossroads. While the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) continues to expand access through the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), a controversial cut-off mark reduction—especially the decision to peg university admission at 140/400—has ignited fierce debates among educators, students, and stakeholders nationwide.
This article combines key data and developments from the 2025 UTME with a critical analysis of the lowered academic standards, unveiling systemic threats that may jeopardize the integrity of Nigeria’s higher education system.
📊 JAMB 2025 UTME: Key Statistics and Technical Challenges
JAMB conducted the 2025 UTME between April 24 and May 5, involving over 2 million candidates across 784 CBT centres nationwide.
Performance Breakdown:
- 78% of candidates scored below 200/400, indicating one of the lowest pass rates in JAMB history.
- Only 12,414 candidates scored above 300, representing just 0.63% of the total.
- 39,834 results were withheld for review, and 3,000+ cases of malpractice were recorded.
Technical Issues:
JAMB experienced widespread server failures during the first three days of testing, especially in Lagos and the South-East, affecting nearly 380,000 candidates. Although a resit exam was conducted, public confidence in JAMB’s systems has taken a hit.
🔥 Cut-Off Mark Controversy: Lowering the Bar or Killing the System?
New National Cut-Off Marks:
- Universities: 140
- Polytechnics & Colleges of Education: 100
- Nursing Sciences: 140
While the policy aims at inclusion, critics argue that admitting students with 35% scores compromises educational integrity and erodes academic competitiveness.
⚠️ Why This Matters: A Critical Breakdown
1. Quality of Student Input (Garbage In, Garbage Out)
Allowing candidates who scored below 150 into universities weakens the student pool. Professors are forced to teach down, slowing academic progression and ultimately churning out less competent graduates.
2. Erosion of Academic Standards
Top institutions like UNILAG and ABU used to peg admission at 200+. A 140 threshold signals a dangerous systemic collapse, as warned by scholars like Prof. Terhemba Wuam.
3. Demotivating Bright Students
Bright students who prepared rigorously may feel their efforts are undervalued when mediocre scores gain admission. This reduces the drive for excellence and affects overall campus culture.
4. Inclusion Without Foundation
The new policy is viewed as a shortcut to address northern educational disparity, yet without investing in basic education infrastructure, underprepared students remain vulnerable.
5. Reputation and Employability
Graduates from schools with lowered entry standards may suffer discrimination in the job market. Employers may associate certain schools with “low-bar” graduates, harming their professional credibility.
6. The Bigger Risk: Institutional Collapse
When universities are populated with students lacking foundational knowledge, it affects teaching quality, research output, and leadership development—eventually destabilizing Nigeria’s entire academic ecosystem.
🛠️ The Path to Reform: Real Inclusion, Not Illusion
✅ Merit-Based Admissions
Universities should retain higher cut-off marks (180–200) and use post-UTME assessments to filter for preparedness.
✅ Strengthen Secondary Education
Revamp primary and secondary school systems through curriculum overhaul, teacher training, and infrastructure development to boost UTME performance.
✅ Regional Equity Through Investment
Rather than lowering standards, invest in schools across underserved zones to uplift regional academic strength long-term.
✅ Remedial Support Programs
Create targeted remedial or foundation year programs to prepare underperforming students before full university entry.
🗣️ Final Analysis: What’s at Stake for Nigeria?
With the 2025 UTME plagued by poor performance, technical errors, and a drastic lowering of admission standards, Nigeria faces a pivotal choice:
- Prioritize short-term inclusion with lowered cut-off marks that risk diluting the university system?
- Or pursue long-term excellence, investing in foundational education and upholding academic integrity?
JAMB’s efforts to ensure inclusivity and equal opportunity are commendable, but inclusivity without competence breeds mediocrity, unemployment, and disillusionment.
💬 Final Word:
Nigeria’s educational future depends on bold reforms—not shortcuts. Stakeholders, parents, policymakers, and institutions must demand higher standards, better accountability, and smarter investment in the minds that will shape Nigeria’s tomorrow.
📢 Join the Conversation – Take Action for Nigeria’s Educational Future!
🎓 Are you a student, parent, teacher, or policymaker concerned about Nigeria’s education system?
📉 Do you believe lowering cut-off marks helps or hurts our future?
🧠 Have you or someone you know been affected by the 2025 UTME?
👇 Don’t just read—get involved!
✅ Leave a comment below to share your opinion
✅ Share this article with friends, educators, and policymakers—this conversation matters
📌 Let’s build an education system that values merit, fosters equity, and prepares our youth for global excellence. Together, we can make change happen.
(C) Channel TV Livestream
Comments
Post a Comment